http://blog.gurock.com/postings/linux-router-wifi-vpn-5-x-ethernet-for-60/153/ Our products, programming & business. Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:41:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://blog.gurock.com/postings/linux-router-wifi-vpn-5-x-ethernet-for-60/153/comment-page-1/#comment-553 Dennis Gurock Tue, 27 Jun 2006 19:04:28 +0000 http://software.gurock.com/postings/linux-router-wifi-vpn-5-x-ethernet-for-60/153/#comment-553 Xepol, you are probably right that such a router isn't great for many concurrent connections. We don't host any websites behind it (except remote email access etc) so it's more than enough for us. The router has 16MB RAM btw and there are other routers that are based on the same board with 32 MB, so it should at least handle as much connections as older PCs that are often used as routers. Xepol, you are probably right that such a router isn’t great for many concurrent connections. We don’t host any websites behind it (except remote email access etc) so it’s more than enough for us. The router has 16MB RAM btw and there are other routers that are based on the same board with 32 MB, so it should at least handle as much connections as older PCs that are often used as routers.

]]> http://blog.gurock.com/postings/linux-router-wifi-vpn-5-x-ethernet-for-60/153/comment-page-1/#comment-552 Xepol Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:59:53 +0000 http://software.gurock.com/postings/linux-router-wifi-vpn-5-x-ethernet-for-60/153/#comment-552 Sorry, by ports I actually meant connections (I was mighty tired when I wrote that yesterday). Both incoming and outgoing connections. Sorry, by ports I actually meant connections (I was mighty tired when I wrote that yesterday). Both incoming and outgoing connections.

]]> http://blog.gurock.com/postings/linux-router-wifi-vpn-5-x-ethernet-for-60/153/comment-page-1/#comment-549 Xepol Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:51:40 +0000 http://software.gurock.com/postings/linux-router-wifi-vpn-5-x-ethernet-for-60/153/#comment-549 I would be interested in hearing about how well it performs under heavier loads, say once you get a few hundred ports going. Traditionally, this is where most of the low end routers really fail. They can't handle more than 50 or so simultaneous connections simply because they don't have the resources (ram mostly) to track more. I would be interested in hearing about how well it performs under heavier loads, say once you get a few hundred ports going. Traditionally, this is where most of the low end routers really fail. They can’t handle more than 50 or so simultaneous connections simply because they don’t have the resources (ram mostly) to track more.

]]>